Does all practice in a religious social work agency have to reflect that religion?

An American Catholic archbishop has made a speech that raises issues that should be considered by Catholic social work agencies, agencies and social work practitioners with other religious or denominational commitments and anyone who is thinking about: 'what is the nature of social work'?

The main point he is making is that if you are going to call yourself a Catholic social agency or Catholic social worker your practice has to reflect and espouse your Catholic beliefs. Otherwise stop calling yourself a Catholic.

I think there are some problems with this point of view. To start with, I know some Catholic agencies that say: 'We are Catholics providing services for everyone'. I remember Catholic Social Services in Liverpool, when I was involved with them as saying this: I don't know what their policy is now. I also remember some children that I was responsible on behalf of local authority who were 'in care' (being 'looked after' in current jargon) in a children's home run by nuns from a Catholic children's agency; again, Catholics helping children in general rather than just Catholic children.

There are many care and aid agencies that operate with wider communities in this way. If they are going to do social work, they will have to accept different denominational and cultural beliefs and values and behave in a neutral way about these; thus not including their Catholic emphasis in everything that they do. The aim of a social agency is not to be 'useful to the Gospel' as the Archbishop puts it, in this way. They are useful to the Gospel by demonstrating that Christians care about everyone, whoever they are.

Archbishop Chaput's point, though, is a bit different. He is commenting on a situation that we have also experienced in the UK, and will probably be a worldwide issue. That is, if equalities legislation says you cannot discriminate against gay and lesbian people in an adoption and fostering service, you shouldn't run an adoption  and fostering service.

There is a practical problem here: how far does a Catholic go? Do Catholic social workers or agencies have nothing to do with a child care system that accepts decision-making on these grounds that are so anti-Catholic. In that case, Catholic people rule themselves out of engagement with increasingly wide swathes of social provision. Or do they accept that some of it goes on, but avoid direct involvement with it. You can almost see the Catholic working in a school, jumping back faced with a child of gay adoptive parents saying: 'Ugh, no! We cannot teach that person, they are contaminated'. Well no, most Catholics I know and most Christians, maintain a concern for others and do their job with others, even though they may not like the social trends reflected in some of the things that happen. So a Catholic agency or a Catholic social worker should not be saying: 'we don't go there'.

The Archbishop is quoted as saying: 'Catholic ministries “have the duty to faithfully embody Catholic beliefs on marriage, the family, social justice, sexuality, abortion and other important issues. And if the state refuses to allow those Catholic ministries to be faithful in their services through legal or financial bullying,” he added, “then as a matter of integrity, they should end their services.”

There's a broader ethical point: if you agree to provide services to the public, you have to accept that the society in which that public lives may not agree with you about many of the things you believe, and a public service means an equal service for all the public, not the ones you happen to agree with. If they don't agree, and the law, which enacts the general settlement in a society about an issue, supports them, a Christian should not just take their bat and ball home. To me, then, this stance is not Christian, and so therefore cannot be very Catholic.

More important, it is not and can never be social work. The whole point about social work is that it is concerned with achieving more solidarity and resilience in social relationships among all peoples. An agency or a practitioner that says: 'We don't do these kinds of social relationships' cannot be a social work agency or practitioner because their social preferences detract from general social engagement.

Of course, any agency can decide on an admissions policy that limits the range of people and issues that that they deal with. I know several Jewish agencies that focus on providing services for Jewish people in their area only and several Muslim and Hindu agencies whose style, presentation and policy means that they are only likely to attract clients from their particular community. but they don't say: 'We're not going to have anything to do with the way in which most of society wants to play ball'. You're cutting yourself off from that society, and with a good deal of arrogance too.

A bit of Christan humility means taking part in society, and not rejecting fundamental principles about how that society is run, such as equality with people who you don't like and don't agree with. I don't want to see Christians of any kind (or any other religion) cutting themselves off in this kind of way. What does a Catholic social worker who is committed to equality and who wants to work in adoption and fostering, a vital and valued service, do? Catholic agencies are closed to them, does it mean all practice in this area is closed to them, too? I suppose the Archbishop would say that in their professional practice they are not pursuing a 'Christian ministry'. Yes, but can't a valuable social agency do the same thing?

The account of the speech by Archbishop Chaput: : http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/archbishop-chaput-warns-about-catholic-institutions-losing-religious-identity/