Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts

Thursday, 1 January 2015

Social work is specially needed in countries with histories of social destruction

The challenges of being the only social worker in eastern Congo http://gu.com/p/43p33

This Guardian feature offers a useful picture of social work in a country suffering the consequences of past social disruption and the resulting pressures on individuals and families. Just ideal circumstances to employ social workers in, but obviously a place in which the social priorities mean that providing social care is at the end of the list of things to do. We need to promote the value of services that respond to social need as an important part of any society, even or perhaps especially in countries experiencing great poverty.

Thursday, 8 November 2012

We need a new economics that does not blame the poor, 'anticrisis' jokes are not enough



Another post with my thoughts on issues raised by the new Spanish social work journal, Azarbe.

Economic crisis always has social impacts, in which economics blames the poor and individual failure rather than raising questions about the social impacts of economics. I recently took part in a Facebook debate about this issue, raised by a colleague in Portugal, also facing social effects of an economic crisis that has social consequences.  

One article has data on the effects of the Spanish economic crisis in family poverty. But should we really see this as a Spanish problem, or as a European responsibility, since the crisis is European? Another article comments on the need to develop a community social work, since the ‘economic crisis’ encourages a neo-Darwinism individualism in policy. We ned a new economics that does not lay the blame and the consequences of economic change on our poor and marginalised communities.

Visiting Spain recently...
I saw for sale labelled 'Anticrisis'...
...money boxes picturing Euros...

...and tissues in Euro form, too.
 

Friday, 16 March 2012

Quiet advocacy for social equity - Helen Stuchberry's life

One of the side gains of being associated (I have forgotten what my role is actually called) with the journal Australian Social Work, is that I also occasionally get sent the magazine of the Australian Association of Social Workers. This time it has an obituary of Helen Stuchberry, a well-known Australian social worker, who died last year.

Her life story is in part a record of the disadvantages women suffered in achieving their aspirations in part generations. She wanted to be a scientist, but women were disadvantaged in that field. So she became a social worker and when she became pregnant with her first daughter had to resign from her government job because women with children couldn't hold a government post.

Later, went back into hospital social work, and eventually held senior posts in various community health and social care roles. After she retired, she worked in various voluntary roles, including setting up a hostel providing accommodation for older people in her community.

Her early experience with the social security department gave her experience of social disadvantage that developed her 'great compassion for the disadvantaged and the need for social equity that would ground her for life'. The article says: 'Helen was a lifetime advocate for social justice, which she often achieved through gentle pressure in the right places'.

Quiet advocacy may be unfashionable with some, but it has achieved a lot in the world.

Thursday, 15 March 2012

Democracy should be committed to concern for poor people's rights


The Times of India reports the suicide of an Indian post-graduate in social work, Pankaj Wankari, after he became involved with Naxalites (a Maoist splinter group of the former Indian communist parties). He had been arrested and was interrogated by the Police (although he was not abused and he was not arrested or charged with any offence). It seems he had unknowingly had contact with the people engaged in Naxalite campaigning. His suicide note said: ‘It was my simplicity that others took advantage of and so I am…’

According to his brother, his commitment was ‘to work for spreading awareness among the poor about their rights’. It’s a pity that that kind of personal and professional commitment, natural for any social worker you would have thought, gets picked up by people with a more disruptive ideology. It's not simplicity to seek justice for poor people.

But it’s also a problem for democratic regimes that their lack of action on about poor people’s rights allows extremist political positions to seem the only recourse, when poor people’s rights and needs ought to be a natural concern for people of all political positions.